DPA Handling
DPA turnaround < 5 days
Data Processing Agreements are the specialised contract vehicle GDPR made unavoidable. Every enterprise customer now requires one; every DPA has 20-40 pages of legal language; every DPA request costs legal-team time regardless of whether the terms are standard or non-standard. The temptation to just sign the customer's version to speed the deal is real — and dangerous.
An hour-by-hour walkthrough.
Step by step.
- 01
Ingest DPA request
Customer's DPA (or DPA-attachment on a broader MSA) submitted via Slack, email, or DocuSign envelope. Lex reads the document and classifies as DPA.
Slack · Email · DocuSign - 02
Match to standard or route custom
Diff against our approved DPA template. Categorise each clause: exact match, minor wording (non-material), material difference. Recommend response for each category.
Knowledge Studio · Diff analysis - 03
Sign or negotiate
Standard DPAs (all clauses match or minor wording): Lex prepares countersignature + sends via DocuSign after quick attorney check. Non-standard: Lex drafts response + routes to privacy counsel with material items highlighted.
DocuSign · Legal review queue - 04
Store record
Signed DPA archived to Ironclad with metadata: customer, effective date, term, material variations from template, subprocessor list. Discoverable in contract search.
Ironclad
What you connect to make this run.
Ironclad · Adobe Sign
read+writeApproved DPA template lives in Ironclad. Lex diffs incoming against template; writes signed docs back with metadata.
DocuSign
read+writeOAuth with envelope-read + envelope-create scopes. Reads inbound envelopes for auto-classification; sends countersignature envelopes.
Knowledge Studio
readDPA template + past-negotiated variations indexed. Lex references past deals to draft recommendations grounded in precedent.
Salesforce
readDeal context — ARR, urgency, sales-cycle stage. Enables risk-appropriate response drafting.
Before and after, honestly.
Playbooks that pair with this one.
MSA & SOW From Templates
DPAs often accompany MSAs; both use the same template-diff pattern.
Customer Security Questionnaire Support
Security questionnaires often precede DPA requests; complementary workflow.
Subprocessor List Management
DPA reviews affect subprocessor list disclosures.
Data Subject Request Routing
DPAs commit us to DSAR flow; both follow the same GDPR-compliance loop.
Answers about this playbook.
What about DPAs from small customers with quirky templates?
Same flow. Small customers with quirky templates surface as "many material differences" and route to counsel. Often the fastest path is: "here's our standard DPA, would this work for you?" — counsel drafts that response.
How does Lex handle sub-processor changes?
Sub-processor list changes trigger notifications per DPA terms. Adjacent playbook (subprocessor-list-management) coordinates the notifications; DPA-handling captures the notification requirements per customer at signing.
What if the customer requires audit rights we can't accommodate?
Audit-rights variations are common; Lex categorises as material and routes to GC. Recommendations grounded in what we've accepted for similar-tier customers previously.
Can Lex handle EU vs. US DPAs?
Yes — jurisdiction-appropriate templates. GDPR-specific for EU customers; state-privacy-law variants for US. Lex reads customer location to select template baseline.
How does this integrate with our CLM (Ironclad)?
Ironclad is the CLM source of truth. Lex reads the customer's contract history for context, writes signed DPAs back with full metadata. Ironclad handles the ongoing lifecycle (amendments, renewals, expiration).
See it run on your data.
Free plan, no credit card. Connect the systems this playbook needs and run it against a past event first.