Subpoena Response
100% subpoenas responded to within statutory deadline
A subpoena arrives — from law enforcement, opposing counsel, regulator, or civil litigant — with a fast deadline and specific data demands. Someone in the mailroom scans it, forwards to legal, who scrambles to determine scope, identify custodians, preserve data, coordinate collection, redact, and produce the response. Deadlines slip, over-production reveals unrelated data, under-production means motion-to-compel. The workflow that runs on "someone remembers" fails predictably under pressure.
An hour-by-hour walkthrough.
Step by step.
- 01
Intake + parse the subpoena
Log intake, extract demand (data types, custodians, timeframe, deadline). GC notified within the hour. Log ID assigned.
Legal case management · Email · Physical mail scan - 02
Immediate legal hold + custodian identification
Legal hold on named custodians + adjacent systems. Custodian expansion via Context Graph (project membership, correspondence).
Legal hold platform · Context Graph · HRIS - 03
Scope + coordinate outside counsel if needed
Scope analysis: data types, volume, complexity. Escalate to outside counsel for high-stakes or specialized responses.
eDiscovery estimation · Outside counsel registry - 04
Collect + review + redact
eDiscovery collection from named systems. Responsiveness review, privilege review, redaction. Chain-of-custody at every step.
eDiscovery (Relativity · Everlaw · Reveal) · Review workflow - 05
Produce + document
Production package: cover letter, privilege log, affidavit of completeness, Bates-numbered records per format spec. Delivered before deadline.
Production tools · Delivery mechanism (SFTP · secure portal · certified mail)
What you connect to make this run.
Legal case management (iManage · NetDocs · dedicated)
read+writeCase-level record of the subpoena + timeline + actions + delivery. Auditor + court-referenceable.
eDiscovery (Relativity · Everlaw · Reveal · Logikcull)
read+writeData collection + review + redaction + production. Chain-of-custody enforced.
Legal hold platform
read+writeImmediate holds on named custodians. Coordination with the legal-hold playbook.
Outside counsel registry + engagement
read+writeEscalation for high-stakes responses. Coordination on strategy, review, filing.
Before and after, honestly.
Answers about this playbook.
What if the subpoena is defective (wrong jurisdiction, unclear scope)?
GC + outside counsel review for defects. Motion to quash or narrow may be appropriate. Lex tracks the challenge alongside the response deadline.
How does it handle Grand Jury or gag-ordered subpoenas?
Restricted-access flow. Only named parties can see the subpoena; regular escalation channels disabled. Confidentiality strictly enforced.
What about international subpoenas (Hague, MLAT)?
Cross-border request handling with jurisdictional review. Different response mechanisms per treaty; outside counsel involvement typical.
How does it handle NDA obligations vs. subpoena compliance?
Subpoena compels; NDA doesn't override. Notify affected NDA parties of the compelled production per NDA terms.
What about internal-employee subpoenas (custody, divorce, personal matters)?
Different scope; usually a formal request rather than corporate response. Routed to HR + legal for individual-employee support.
See it run on your data.
Free plan, no credit card. Connect the systems this playbook needs and run it against a past event first.